The other day, the soon-to-be-departing interim director at a local senior care community challenged the residents to do just that - to consider the strengths & advantages of aging, including (especially?) significant old age. He suggested they each draw up a list of goals they wanted to achieve over the next five years. One of them said, "Survive." Sadly, most of the others nodded their heads in agreement.
The reality is that a cultural bias against not just the aged but aging has gone into hyper-drive over the past generation. Whether it's tagged the Information Age, the Computer Age or the Digital Age, it has no place for the concept of taking years to master life or an area of expertise. Today, the skill most highly valued by many in the most sought-after professions is the ability to forget what you've learned & relearn new information all again, over & over. Mastery is an archaic concept, supplanted by wipe your memory bank clean & start fresh.
What's been lost is a spiritual sense of living, a sense of higher purpose. For thousands & thousands of years, it took all of our energy to just stay alive. About 5,000 years ago, civilizations that looked past just mere survival started to develop. Humans had the wealth & the time to seek lives of purpose. Where earlier mankind sought to survive, over the millennia we progressively looked to the importance of leaving a lasting, valuable legacy. Productivity was important in the first part of our lives, but the latter part typically looked to the future, to the heritage left behind.
As technology started its ascent, traditional spirituality faced an increasing decline. Not long ago, it was commonly believed that our younger years - up to retirement age - are the gathering portion of our life, while the latter (once termed our "golden years") are for giving back through purpose, living out legacy, helping youngers see meaning in life, even an opportunity for younger family members to experience the challenges & rewards of providing support. There was a sense of interconnection, of looking back & forward at the same time.
One of the things missing more & more in our culture regarding the aged & elderly is a sense of caring, of compassion. In place of compassion, our success has bred self-loathing as we increasingly find ourselves victims of the lofty goal we sought. Having achieved a longer life span, our culture debases aging & the elderly.
For some reason, my contemporaries think this will all change by the time we reach our late 80s, 90s, pass 100. Not me. Where is the incentive to flip our culture's bias against those who are 50+? I don't see it. I do see science letting us survive longer & longer, but live better & better? That eludes me.
Sarah Kagan uses a term that particularly hits home with me - in the self-centeredness of ageism, we are stuck in the moment. We are encouraged to put blinders on, to turn a blind eye to the many ways ageism rejects the premise that what we can do is, by nature, a birth-to-death process to be embraced, not demeaned.
No comments:
Post a Comment